
CARBROZO, C.J. (Majority Opinion, 9-0)
How is this even possible? BJs are like dog sniffs, they don't require consent. Just sit back and let it happen cuz you aren't getting your money back. Oh, it was free... even better. Case dismissed.
BRONNAN, J. (Concurring)
The majority reasoning dismisses blowies as not a forceable act. I, too, believe that the case should be tossed; however, the majority is overlooking the possible interpretation of this decision by the public. Guy on girl: bad; girl on guy: okay? Is this the social agenda we want to promote.
brO'CONNOR, J. (Concurring, Dissenting with BRONNAN's concurrence)
I also agree with the majority outcome. I would like to contest Bronnan's opinion. I would LOVE this social agenda. Please, any female reading this, you are hereby encouraged to surprise men with beejs. Also, by looking at the perp, we can determine as a matter of fact she is at least a 3, probably a 5 or 6 (see Chick Rating Scale, attached). FRCB Rule 301(c)(1) (BJs, The After) suggests that a bro should not be ashamed of fellatio received from a female who is above a 3 on the aforementioned scale. For that reason, and the majority's, this case should be dismissed and the party pressing charges should be submitted to tests for potentially contracting the gay.